DNA Assembly
At its simplest, DNA Assembly is the process by which parts are connected to one another. Assembling two parts results in a new, larger composite part. Assembly allows for the creation of parts, circuits, and systems that are more complex in function.
Assembly in iGEM
iGEM teams are encouraged to use the assembly methods of their choice. Teams may be using a Type IIS assembly method, Gibson, BioBricks, or something entirely different. We also encourage teams to build their parts and devices entirely with synthesis when possible.
We want to live in a future where assembly is no longer an issue, however, we're not there just yet! BioBrick RFC[10 and iGEM Type IIS (RFC[1000]) are the iGEM Registry's current de facto assembly standards. Ensuring your parts are assembly compatible allows iGEM to synthesize your parts in BioBrick and/or Type IIS sample formats. Others can easily and reliably use and assemble these parts in the future.
All parts on the iGEM Registry that will be considered for the iGEM Competition (medals, awards, etc.) must be assembly compatible for BioBrick or iGEM Type IIS. It is critical that you keep this in mind during the Design stage of your project. You are not required to use these assembly methods in your project, you only have to ensure that the parts you have made would be compatible with either of these assembly standards.
iGEM's DNA Distribution kits are now primarily Type IIS Level 0 parts. iGEM's Level 0 parts adhere to the MoClo ↗ and Loop Type IIS ↗ standards.
What is an Assembly Standard?
An assembly standard defines how parts will be assembled together by the engineer. More generally, an assembly standard documents the requirements, properties, and formatting needed for part samples to be correctly assembled. For example, BioBrick RFC[10] standard ensures compatibility between parts, allowing part samples to be assembled together to create new longer and more complex parts, while still maintaining the structural elements of the assembly standard.
What is Assembly Compatibility?
Assembly compatibility is defined in the documentation of an assembly standard. In general it refers to the sequence requirements for a part to correctly work in an assembly reaction, including any subsequent assemblies.
This will include defining the recognition sites of any restriction enzymes used in an assembly standard as "illegal" sites. For example, a part is not BioBrick compatible if it includes an EcoRI recognition sequence (GAATTC) within its sequence, as EcoRI is used in the BioBrick prefix that would flank a sample of that part.
A part can also be compatible with multiple assembly standards, as long as its sequence follows the requirements of said standards. As an example, BBa_J23101 is compatible with both BioBrick RFC[10] and iGEM Type IIS assembly standards. Similarly, you could use BBa_J23101 in an entirely synthesized design or a Gibson assembly.
Please read through the documentation of any standard you are using, as there may be additional sequence requirements beyond the specific restriction enzyme recognition sites.

Remember, all parts on the Registry that will be considered for the iGEM Competition (medals, awards, etc.) must be assembly compatible for BioBrick or iGEM Type IIS. You are not required to use these assembly methods in your project, you only have to ensure that the parts you have made would be compatible with either of these assembly standards.
BioBrick RFC[10] Standard
Introduction
The BioBrick RFC[10] standard, developed by Tom Knight in 2002, is a standard for interchangeable parts based on idempotent assembly.
BioBrick RFC[10] was the most commonly used assembly standard in iGEM, and to this day, the majority of parts in the iGEM Registry are BioBrick compatible.
BioBrick RFC[10] is a foundational standard for synthetic biology, and is still in use due to its simplicity, idempotent design, and large library of parts.
The information below is a summarization of the technical aspects of the BioBrick RFC[10] standard.
We recommend reading through Idempotent Vector Design for Standard Assembly of Biobricks ↗ and Draft Standard for Biobrick Biological Parts ↗.
Why is idempotent assembly so important? > "Each [assembly] reaction leaves the key structural elements of the component the same. > The output of any such transformation is a component which can be used as the input to any subsequent manipulation. > It need never be constructed again – it can be added to the permanent library of previously assembled components, and used as a compound structure in more complex assemblies."
Technical Specifications
Prefix and Suffix
The prefix and suffix flank a BioBrick part on either side, this means that the documented sequence of a part must never include the prefix or suffix. The plasmid backbone is defined as the sequence starting with the suffix and ending at the prefix.
The standard BioBrick prefix and suffix that flank a BioBrick part are as follows:
Prefix Suffix
5' - GAATTC GCGGCCGC T TCTAGA G ...part... T ACTAGT A GCGGCCG CTGCAG - 3'
EcoRI NotI XbaI SpeI NotI PstI
The following is the alternate prefix designed specifically for CDS parts (parts start with ATG).
Prefix Suffix
5' - GAATTC GCGGCCGC T TCTAG ...part... T ACTAGT A GCGGCCG CTGCAG - 3'
EcoRI NotI XbaI SpeI NotI PstI
The alternate prefix for CDS parts addresses spacing issues between an RBS - CDS scar when assembled. Specifically, this shortened prefix will result in a shorter scar (6bp) between an RBS and CDS part, and be less disruptive to the RBS.
Please see RBS-CDS issues on the Registry for more information.
Note that the sequence of the BioBrick suffix is always the same.
Assembly Scars
Assembly Scars are artifacts of the assembly process (restriction digest and ligation). Assembling two parts leaves the following scar between the parts.
5' [part A] TACTAGAG [part B] 3'
The scar between a RBS and CDS part (due to the alternate prefix) is:
5' [RBS part] TACTAG [CDS part] 3'
Assembly Compatibility
In order for a part to be compatible with BioBrick RFC[10] it must not contain the following restriction sites, as these are unique to the prefix and suffix:
EcoRI site: GAATTC
XbaI site: TCTAGA
SpeI site: ACTAGT
PstI site: CTGCAG
NotI site: GCGGCCGC
Assembly Method and Protocols
In order to assemble BioBrick parts, iGEM recommends the 3A (3 Antibiotic) Assembly Method.
3A assembly uses the restriction sites on the prefix and suffix to assemble part samples.
This new composite part maintains the same prefix and suffix as its "parents" and contains an assembly scar, where the cut and re-ligated restriction sites were stitched together.
By ligating the new composite part into a plasmid backbone with a different antibiotic resistance, 3A Assembly uses effective antibiotic selection to eliminate unwanted background colonies and eliminates the need for gel purification and colony PCR of the resulting colonies.

Resources
- 3A Assembly Protocol (iGEM Registry)
- 3A Assembly Overview (iGEM Registry)
- PCR Standardization for BioBrick parts
References
iGEM Type IIS Assembly
Introduction
With Golden Gate (Type IIS) assembly, multiple parts can be assembled easily and reliably in a single reaction, and this can be scaled further to create more complex genetic circuits quickly, efficiently, and affordably.
Currently, there are several Type IIS assembly standards, including expansions to the Golden Gate / MoClo standard in use. Many of these were designed for specific purposes, including chassis-specific work, greater felxibility and complexity for creating a transcription unit, or changes to assembling multi-transcription units.
The Type IIS assembly standard that iGEM accepts is based on Loop ↗ and MoClo ↗ assembly standards.
The technical specifications of iGEM Type IIS, RCF[1000], are laid out in the documentation below. This documentation will describe what makes a part compatible with the standard, and the requirements to create a sample of a part in the assembly schema. This is not meant to be a complete resource for Golden Gate assembly. In stead, please see our resources on Golden Gate assembly, and the Loop ↗ and MoClo ↗ assembly standards.
Overview
- Assembly Compatibility: Registry parts that adhere to iGEM Type IIS (RFC 1000) must not have BsaI and SapI Type IIS recognition sequences within their documented sequence.
- Fusion Sites: RFC[1000] specifies the fusion sites that will flank samples of basic parts (Level 0), transcriptional units (Level 1), and multi-transcriptional units (Level 2, 3). These are based on the MoClo and Loop Assembly standards.
The table below conforms iGEM's part abstraction (basic/composite) and part types, with the terminology (Levels 0, 1, 2, etc.) commonly used by other Type IIS assembly standards.
Technical Specifications
Assembly Compatibility
Parts that are compatible with iGEM Type IIS RCF[1000] must not contain the BsaI and SapI Type IIS recognition sequences within their documented sequence. These two restriction enzymes are required for assembly.
Sequence (Forward) Sequence (Reverse)
BsaI site: 5'...GGTCTC >>...3' 5'...<< GAGACC...3'
3'...CCAGAG >>...5' 3'...<< CTCTGG...5'
SapI site: 5'...GCTCTTC >>...3' 5'...<< GAAGAGC...3'
3'...CGAGAAG >>...5' 3'...<< CTTCTCG...5'
Parts that have these illegal recognition sites are not compatible with the standard. In order to check for Type IIS compatibility, view the Assembly Compatibility box below a part's sequence and features. RFC[1000] is the draft name for iGEM's Type IIS standard.

Why were these restriction enzymes selected?
One benefit of Type IIS assembly standards is that the assembly method requires only two restriction enzymes for creation of basic parts (Level 0s), assembly of composite parts or transcription units (Level 1s), and multiple transcription units (Level 2+). Fewer illegal restriction sites means it will be easier to make compatible parts. Other Type IIS assembly standards may require different Type IIS restriction enzymes (AarI, BsmbI, BbsI, etc.), but in order to ensure ease of making parts compatible, the RFC 1000 standard only designates BsaI and SapI as “illegal” restriction sites.
Why BsaI and SaI?
Most, if not all, Type IIS assembly standards use BsaI for basic parts (Level 0), so this ensures maximum compatibility.
In addition to BsaI, Loop Assembly requires SapI. While this restriction enzyme site only leaves a 3bp overhang, it has a 7bp recognition site, which theoretically will make it rarer, and make standardization of parts easier. For iGEM Type IIS, we have also modified the PhytoBricks Universal Acceptor plasmid, so that users can PCR their Level 0 parts into the iGEM Type IIS Universal Acceptor using SapI. Cost analysis has shown that SapI, while initially more expensive than BioBrick enzymes, is within the price range of other Type IIS enzymes, and when scaled up to several rounds of multi-part assembly is affordable.
What about the BioBrick RFC10 restriction enzymes?
Your Type IIS RFC1000 parts do not need to be BioBrick RFC10 compatible. Your BioBrick parts do not need to be Type IIS RFC1000 compatible.
Basic Parts (Level 0s)
Fusion Sites
iGEM's Type IIS assembly standard specifies fusion sites that flank samples of the four basic parts types (Level 0): Promoter, RBS, CDS, Terminator.
Fusion Site 5' Part Type Fusion Site 3'
GGAG Promoter TACT
TACT 5'UTR AATG
AATG CDS GCTT
GCTT Terminator CGCT
Note, for the purposes of documentation on the iGEM Registry, these fusion sites do not belong on a basic part's documented sequence. Instead, they belong to the prefix and suffix of the plasmid backbone that will be storing a sample of said part. There is an exception to this when documenting a CDS as your CDS will have a start codon (ATG). This ATG is also used in the 5' fusion site for all CDSs (AATG).
To ensure maximum compatibility, iGEM has adopted these fusion sites as they were outlined in the original MoClo paper (Weber, et al. 2011 ↗). They have since been adopted in other Type IIS assembly standards. As an example, these MoClo fusion sites completely overlap with the PhytoBricks ↗ standard.
These fusion sites have also been tested against NEB’s 4bp ligation fidelity tool ↗, finding them to be completely reliable when used as a set in a reaction.
iGEM has elected to not define additional fusion sites for other parts and sub-parts. These can be selected by the user depending on their assembly approach, or as laid out by other Type IIS assembly standards like the PhytoBricks standard.
Assembly
In a Level 0 plasmid backbone, a sample of these basic parts would be stored like so, with BsaI sites and fusion sites on the prefix and suffix flanking the part. You can create new basic parts through PCR and cloning into pSB1C00, the Universal Acceptor Vector for Level 0s.

When samples of these basic parts are cut with BsaI and assembled together into a Level 1 plasmid backbone, it results in a composite part (Level 1), specifically a transcription unit, with the fusion sites now becoming scars within the composite part's sequence.

Most importantly, when you're documenting an assembled composite part on the iGEM Registry, make sure to enter in the exact scars (fusion sites) you used for your assembly.
Transcription Units (Level 1s)
In Loop assembly, Level 0 basic parts can be assembled into a set of pOdd vectors. These Level 1 transription units (TU) will be flanked by Sap1 recognition sites and fusion sites, enabling further assembly of up to 4 transcription units.
Fusion Sites
Fusion Site 5' TU Fusion Site 3'
ATG TU 1 GCA
GCA TU 2 TAC
TAC TU 3 CAG
CAG TU 4 GGT
Assembly

When digested with Sap1 and ligated into a Level 2 (pEven) plasmid backbone in a one-pot reaction, these four trancriptional units will be assembled into a multi-transcriptional unit (MTU).

References
Golden Gate Assembly
Introduction
Golden Gate Assembly (GGA) is an extremely powerful modular assembly technique in synthetic biology that allows for the efficient and precise assembly of multiple DNA fragments into a single construct. It can be used to create complex DNA constructs, such as expression plasmids, circuits or gene clusters.
The power of Golden Gate Assembly permits the creation of off the shelf libraries of DNA parts that can be used for single construct assembly or multiplexed assembly of many constructs. This technique also shines in its ease of multiplexing using automation.

Golden Gate Assembly comprises a number of constituent elements: Type IIS Restriction Enzymes, Parts and Plasmids, and Assembly Standards. On this page we will explore these elements.
What are Type IIS Restriction Enzymes?
Golden Gate Assembly is based on the use of Type IIS restriction endonucleases.
Classic Type II restriction enzymes such as EcoRI ↗ or PstI ↗, used in the BioBrick ↗ assembly standard, bind to specific DNA sequences (recognition sites) and cut within those sites. Most sites are palindromic, meaning recognition sites have the same sequence on both strands of the DNA.
Type IIS restriction enzymes bind to their respective recognition sites, but then cleave the DNA at defined positions away from the recognition sites. After cleaving, single-stranded overhangs remain.
Type IIS recognition sites are also not palindromic, which means that the two strands of the DNA it comprises do not have the same sequence. This permits the flanking of a DNA part, ex. a promoter or gene, with the same recognition site in opposing directions such that the part can be cleaved from its backbone, removing the recognition sites but leaving behind those single-stranded overhangs.

DNA parts that have overhangs with complementary sequences can then anneal to one another. A single Type IIS restriction enzyme can cleave all of the selected parts from their respective plasmid backbones allowing for a one-pot assembly reaction. This offers efficiencies in process and time when compared to assembly methods that rely on Type II enzymes.
One can use Type IIS restriction enzymes to efficiently and scarlessly assemble small components into a much larger DNA sequence using unique native sequences as overhangs. For example, T7 bacteriophage ↗ and even small genomes have been assembled seamlessly from synthesized parts.
However, it is the development of assembly standards in which these overhangs have been standardized, where the real power of Golden Gate Assembly comes into play for DNA construction to engineer biology.
The most commonly used Type IIS restriction enzymes in Golden Gate Assembly are the four base pair cutters BsaI, BbsI, BsmBI, and the three base pair cutter SapI, or isoschizomers of these enzymes.
Among these, BsaI is most often used for assembling basic parts into a transcription unit.
The enzymes do not care what the sequence of the overhangs are, but synthetic biologists do! Notice that cleaving results in a 5’ overhang for all of these Type IIS enzymes.

Anatomy of Parts in Golden Gate Assembly
Parts and Part types
A Golden Gate part is a synthetic DNA sequence flanked by a pair of specific Type IIS restriction enzymes, whether you designed and built it yourself or found it in one of the collections or toolkits. These parts represent a genetic element of a certain “part type”.
In your iGEM distribution you will find a range of part types in the various collections and toolkits. Some part types are regulatory sequences such as promoters, ribosome binding sites (RBSs) for prokaryotes, or terminators whilst others are coding region sequences such as the coding sequences (CDSs) and fusion partners. You most likely will design and build one or more of your own parts to work with those in the distribution.
Some collections have more part types. For example, the E. coli Protein Expression Toolkit has many different signal sequences, purification tags, protease cleavage sites and flexible linkers to give a great many options for protein purification in E. coli. The Open Yeast Collection has other part types outside of the transcription unit including homology arms for genome integration, yeast origins of replication and assembly connectors for hierarchical assembly (more about this later).
Some parts types are composites of regulatory sequences and coding sequences creating complete transcription units. The various yeast selection markers found in the Open Yeast Collection are examples of these composites. They all have a yeast promoter, selection marker gene (CDS) and yeast terminator. These selection markers comprise a full transcription unit and are used for selection of assembled constructs in yeast.
As you look through a collection, keep in mind the part types within. This may differ from collection to collection, and may reflect different assembly standards and interoperability.
The Plasmid Backbone
All parts that exist within a collection are cloned into a plasmid backbone. The sole purpose of the backbone is to propagate the plasmid in E. coli so you can extract the part for use in assembly. The backbone typically has a strong origin of replication for high yields when performing plasmid DNA extraction. The backbone also uses the same antibiotic selection for all of the parts in the collection to permit one-pot-assembly. This contrasts with the destination vector - the backbone that you assemble all your parts in - which has a different antibiotic selection marker.
As you look through a collection or library, keep in mind the plasmid backbone used for parts, as well as the destination vector, this may differ from collection to collection.
For example, the iGEM Engineering collections use a pSB1C3 based plasmid backbone: chloramphenicol resistant, high copy number. The FreeGenes collections use the pOpen-v3 (BBF10K_003498 ↗) backbone: ampicillin / carbenicillin resistant, high copy number.
Fusion Sites
Fusion Sites Make Assembly Work
We call the 5’ BsaI site overhang the 5’ fusion site and the 3’ overhang the 3’ fusion site. All parts will have fusion sites flanking them. In an assembly standard the 3’ fusion site of a part has the same overhang sequence as the 5’ fusion site of the next part in the assembly. This is the same for the 5’ fusion site which is the 3’ fusion site of the previous part. The actual region of the part involved in assembly spans from the 5’ fusion site to the 3’ fusion site - without the Type IIS recognition sequences.
As you use any collection of Golden Gate / Type IIS parts, it is critical that you are aware of the fusion sites it uses, as defined by the assembly standard it follows.
Please also note that some assembly standards will use different terminology for these overhangs, with the 5’ fusion site and 3’ fusion site being referred to as the prefix and suffix, respectively.

As an example, here is BBa_B0034. BBa_B0034 is a commonly used ribosome binding site in iGEM, and variants of it be found in the E. coli Protein Expression Toolkit and iGEM Engineering Collections. This particular version is BBF10K_003410 ↗ and includes extra bases of padding.
As an RBS part that adheres to the MoClo assembly standard, it has a 5' fusion site of TACT and a 3' fusion site of AATG. When cleaved from its plasmid backbone, these overhangs will allow it to anneal to a promoter and CDS part.
What's in an Assembly Reaction?
The Destination Vector
When you have all of the parts you want to assemble, you will need to assemble them into a vector. That is the role of the destination vector, also called a receiving vector or assembly vector. Like the parts' plasmid backbone, the destination vector has an origin of replication as well as an antibiotic selection marker.
The destination vector must also have a different selection marker than that of all of the part backbones used in the assembly. For example, all of the FreeGenes parts are all in an ampicillin resistant backbone and the destination vectors are either kanamycin, chloramphenicol or spectinomycin.
Dropout Markers
Sometimes it is Good to Dropout

Unlike the parts vector, destination vectors also have a counter-selection marker in what is known as a dropout marker (dropout for short). Dropouts are transcription units that allow one to differentiate between assembled vectors and uncut destination vectors. Common reporter genes are LacZ𝛼 for blue/white selection, RFP for fluorescent selection and toxin/antitoxin selection such as ccdB.
In Golden Gate Assembly, the dropouts include Type IIS restriction enzyme recognition sites that are inverted relative to the backbone compared to all of the parts in the assembly. During an assembly, these inverted recognition sites drop out from the destination vector along with the counter-selection marker, leaving the appropriate fusion sites for the completed assembly.
Most destination vectors and their dropouts have overhangs that reflect the original MoClo transcription unit fusion sites - GGAG and CGCT.
Destination vectors may also have a second Type IIS restriction enzyme that differs from the one used to assemble into the vector. This Type IIS resriction enzyme will flank an assembled transcription unit, in order for that transcription unit to be assembled to others in the future. These, along with their respective fusion sites, will be defined by the assembly standard and its hierarchical assembly scheme.
One-pot Assembly
Assembly puts it all together

Once you have all of your parts, whether they are from an existing collection or made by you, the next step is to assemble everything into a final construct. This is known as One-pot Assembly since you put everything for the assembly - parts, destination vector, Type IIS restriction enzyme, T4 DNA Ligase and buffers - in a single PCR tube. When setting up an assembly it is critical that all of the parts are equimolar so there is no imbalance in the ratios of overhangs from part to part.
Assembly Standards
The assembly standard is what defines the rules for DNA part constructions, including where each part type falls within the assembly schema. More specifically it defines the fusion site overhangs of all parts in the schema (syntax).
The original Golden Gate syntax was defined in the Modular Cloning (MoClo) assembly standard paper ↗.

The MoClo Golden Gate assembly standard defines the part types and their overhangs for the transcription unit. Originally it was focused on bacterial genetics but has been expanded to include a wide range of organisms.
Thankfully, many of the assembly standards that have expanded upon MoClo generally follow the same syntax for building a transcription unit. Where they differ might include, an extension of this syntax to allow for greater flexibility and complexity when building a transcription unit. Or they may suggest a different method and syntax for building multi-transcription unit constructs.
As an example, the iGEM Type IIS standard is based completely on Loop Assembly ↗, which in turn uses the MoClo syntax for creation of transcriptional units, and others that overlap with it like Phytobricks ↗.
Hierarchical Assembly
Hierarchical assembly is a multilevel system that starts first with standardized basic parts (Level 0) that make up a collection or toolkit and your own parts. These parts act as building blocks for assembly to typically build a transcription unit (Level 1). Two or more transcription units can then, if needed, be assembled (Level 2) to create a multi-transcription unit construct.
The majority of the parts in the iGEM Distribution are Level 0 (L0) parts. There are also a selection of destination vectors to assemble L0 parts into a Level 1. For example, perhaps your goal is to express and purify the Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MMLV) Reverse Transcriptase (BBF10K_003286 ↗) from the E. coli. Protein Expression Toolkit. All of the L0 parts to create a Level 1 expression construct are available in the E. coli Protein Expression Toolkit and the Open Enzyme Collection in your distribution.
Often you may only need a single Level 1 transcription unit to create a working construct for your needs. But, what if you wanted to assemble two or more transcription units into one construct? Perhaps you are building a metabolic pathway or expressing a restriction enzyme and its methylases.

Once you have assembled and characterized your Level 1 constructs you would then assemble those to create a Level 2 construct.
In order to accomplish that there are a number of assembly standards that have been developed, but typically this involves a second Type IIS restriction enzyme.
If your Level 1 transcription unit plasmids were assembled with BsaI you could then assemble those into a multi-transcription unit plasmid with SapI or BbsI, depending on the assembly standard.
The JUMP collection in the iGEM Distribution, is a set of MoClo compatible destination vectors that also enables hierarchical assembly. As an example, with pJUMP29-1A / BBa_J428341 an engineer can assemble L0 parts into it using BsaI to make a trancription unit (GGAG - CGCT). This transcription unit will be flanked by BsmBI and a pair of fusion sites. Transcriptional units assembled into pJUMP29-1A, pJUMP29-1B, pJUMP29-1C, and pJUMP29-1D, can then be assembled into Level 2 vector, pJUMP49-2A / BBa_J428361, vector with BsmBI.
Protocols
Once you have designed your construct and have your parts, you can proceed to an actual assembly.
First, prepare each part sample; in the case of the iGEM Distribution this would include transforming each sample, making a glycerol stock, miniprepping, and any quality control measures.
Once you have minipreps of all parts, you will need to quantify the DNA (typically in ng/µL). We recommend tracking your parts in a spreadsheet and your notebook, include the quantification, the total plasmid size in base pairs, and the part size (i.e the length from prefix to suffix). From this, calculate the molar concentration of each part with the following equation or use the online NEB calculator ↗.
moles dsDNA (mol) = mass of dsDNA (g)/((length of dsDNA (bp) x 617.96 g/mol/bp) + 36.04 g/mol)
It is essential to add equal molar amounts of each part in a Golden Gate assembly. An imbalance with one part can reduce the efficiency of an assembly reaction.
We recommend this very useful protocol ↗ developed and documented by Shyam Bhakta at the Bennet Lab, Rice University. The documentation covers a variety of Type IIS restriction enzymes.
Resources
iGEM Distribution
The iGEM 2023 distribution has a number of Type IIS libraries and toolkits such as the iGEM Engineering Committee Collections, Asimov’s Mammalian Parts Collection ↗, Open Bioeconomy Lab’s E. coli Protein Expression Toolkit (PET), the Open Enzyme ↗ and Open Reporters ↗ Collections as well as Open Science Network Societies Open Yeast Collection (OYC) ↗. With these libraries you can design and build expression systems for testing in the Design, Build, Test and Learn Cycle ↗. You can augment these collections by creating your own parts through PCR or gene synthesis.
The content of this page was developed by Scott Pownall, PhD ↗ (creator of the the Open Yeast Collection ↗!) and the Open Science Network Society ↗ and adapted for use by iGEM.